If the Bloomberg or Thompson campaigns have bothered to read my prior two posts in this series, I can imagine what they think of them. Who is this nobody to critique our leadership, when the one organization he has ever led was the Park Slope-Windsor Terrace babysitting co-op, and even that for just one term? Who is this nobody to critique our management, when he has never hired anyone, only once led a work team (and found the experience sufficiently frustrating that he would probably not wish to repeat it), and has probably spent less than $500 lifetime on behalf of anyone other than himself, in stamps, paper clips and photocopies as treasurer of the local chapter of the American Planning Association? Well I haven’t been a manager but I have been managed, though I’ll admit to being not much of a follower as well as not a leader. So take my views for what they are worth.
I am, however, an expert in state and local policy, and I did run for (or rather against) the state legislature, for what is (or should be) primarily a public policy position. When doing so, I set out four themes I promised to guided by on every issue without exception, in opposition to a state government that was and is doing the opposite: equity and simplicity in government (against special deals for some but not others), generation equity (in opposition to added privileges for older generations and a diminished future for those who follow), personal and social responsibility (in opposition to something for nothing pandering), and fair value in public services for taxes paid (in opposition to officials whose campaigns are funded by producer interests). It is against these principles, my principles, that I will evaluate the policies of the Bloomberg Administration.