Author: Gatemouth

On Friday, I linked the attached article (from the same day) on my Facebook page, wherein David Storobin made the case for how strong a State Senate candidate he’d be in the Warsaw Ghetto constructed by the State Senate Republicans (even though his own community had been divided in such a manner that they were envying Gaul its good luck).

While I (gack!!!) supported Kevin Parker against Simcha Felder when Felder  ran for State Senate in 2008 (in a working class minority district where his fiscal conservatism was not a good fit), it is hard for me to conceive that (barring the return of Seymour Lachman—who may be a bit too modern Orthodox) this district could do any better than either Felder or David Greenfield (and Greenfield is supporting Fel

So, polls show that about 45% of the country supports a candidate who opposes any sort of tax increase under any circumstances, and about 45% supports a candidate who might consider some level of revenue enhancement to pay for vital infrastructure and other future-minded spending.

This presents a conundrum.

Tom Friedman's solution is to divide the sane vote between multiple candidates and facilitate the return of the Flat Earth Society.

A lot of people wonder why I raise little complaints about ballot access challenges.

As regular readers of this department are aware, I have dedicated a perhaps inordinate amount of prose to the coverage of fringe candidates.

GZA meets ODB.