Room Eight is closed to new posts. The existing archive will remain up for the immediate future.
If you were a Room Eight writer and would like access to an export of your content, please contact the editor.
This site is not affiliated with or collaborating with any other news or opinion site.
I will be the first to admit that my position on the matter of Anthony Weiner is utterly bereft of moral considerations.
It is entirely a political calculus
Weiner is no longer of any use in the role he had staked out for himself; in fact, he is a detriment.
Weiner’s supposed role was as a spokesman and attack dog.
But what can this man, nationally exposed as a liar, sell to anyone any more?
This will not be a lengthy column. It will be relatively straightforward. I dislike hypocrites. It is that simple. I come close to hating them; but since I try not to hate anyone or anything, I don’t quite get there. As long as Anthony Weiner hasn’t broken any criminal laws then he shouldn’t succumb to the pressures being mounted on him to resign right now. The overwhelming majority of people calling for his resignation are hypocrites. And I am talking about both Republicans and Democrats (especially the spineless Democrats).
I have just read three news accounts of Governor Cuomo’s pension proposals. Cuomo does not propose any sacrifices at all for current workers and retirees. None of the news accounts said any of the following.
1) That current employees approaching retirement and current retirees received drastically more generous and costly pensions than they had been promised when they were hired. The unions claimed it would cost nothing, but they lied.
2) That future public employees would not only receive less in pension benefits than current workers and retirees are getting, but also less than they had been promised when they were hired.
3) That future public workers would earn drastically less in overall compensation than current workers and retirees. In the article, the differences is expressed as a “savings” for the government. The comparison between current and future workers is not mentioned, or justified, or questioned. And it’s connection to broader social trends and values across all areas of public policy is unexplored.
Some men like hiking the Appalachian Trail, while others prefer riding the Information Superhighway
I’ll admit that some of these stories have a tangential relationship to our biggest local dick joke (and I’m front-loading them), but these days, even Meow Mix or Henrietta Hudson’s would have trouble being this Weiner-free.
Yoda catches the worst columnist in NYC (and the most despicable member of my Congregation) in a whopper which I wish I'd spotted first.
In this post from last year, I provided a historical overview of the Campaign for Fiscal Equity lawsuit, and referenced some long-term data without providing it in spreadsheets or describing it in detail. Then I provided data for FY 2002 to FY 2008, the latest available at the time, to examine what had changed during the Bloomberg/Mayoral Control era. To change things up, this time I’ll provide the long term data and describe it, and compare the FY 2009 revenue and expenditures per student data in my previous post with the same data for FY 1996. Finally, I’ll use NYC budget documents to compare FY 2009 to the present and the budget proposal for FY 2012.
What emerges in the data is the following story.
As noted in this post, the U.S. Census Bureau has released elementary and secondary school finance data for fiscal year 2009, along with a PDF report with revenue and expenditure data by category for states and larger school districts. I have tabulated the detailed data in a similar way, and have attached to this post a spreadsheet with data for for New York City, Downstate New York, Upstate New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts and the U.S., plus all school districts within New York State. The data includes revenues by source (federal, state and local), and spending by category (instructional vs. non-instructional, wages, benefits and other, interest and debts), all expressed per student. In high-wage high-cost areas – New York City, the Downstate Suburbs, New Jersey and Massachusetts – an adjustment is made for this.
When I first started compiling data from the Governments Division of the U.S. Census Bureau more than 20 years ago, spending on the NYC schools was low, particularly compared with the rest of the New York metropolitan area. Today, however, that is no longer the case. I’ll recount this history, and what has changed for the city from FY 2009 to the current budget proposal, in my next post. But this post will focus on FY 2009, when total spending per student was $22,569 in New York City, $22,357 in the Downstate Suburbs, $18,318 in Upstate New York, and $19,566 in New Jersey. This compares with just $16,406 in Massachusetts and just $12,547 in the U.S. Adjusted for the higher cost of living and general wage level here, New York City’s per student spending at $17,133 was still 36.6% higher than the U.S. average. The Downstate Suburbs were at $16,972, New Jersey at $15,436, and Massachusetts at $12,858 – about the same as the U.S. average once living costs/average wages are adjusted for. New York City’s spending per student, therefore, in addition to being much higher than the U.S. average was also higher than in the Downstate Suburbs or New Jersey. Upstate’s spending was higher still.
Last week I wrote a column on my Room Eight New York Politics blog (www.r8ny.com) about Anthony Weiner’s contemporary political problems. I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, relative to his claim of being “hacked”. Yesterday, at a hastily arranged press conference, Congressman Weiner admitted that the photo of a man’s pubic area -which went viral on the internet last week- was his. He also admitted texting it to a young female student. He further admitted to internet- dalliances with at least six female strangers over the past three years.
Say what you want about Cuomo’s fiscal and budget policies, it is hard to complain about this one. Gov delivers 'robust' ethics reform www.nypost.com