The Latest

Do People At The Manhattan Institute Read Their Own Reports?

|

Steve Malanga, senior editor of the Manhattan Institute’s City Journal has an Op-Ed in Sunday’s New York Post complaining about how New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine is responsible for ruining because of high taxes.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/bribing_the_voters_of_new_jersey_wc8CPVLsmQe5klWsuOeqD

“The state has one of the most progressive income tax structures, so that residents earning more than $250,000 in 2007 (the last year data are available) constituted just 3.9% of all households but paid 59% of state income taxes. And these folks will pay an even bigger share of the burden this year because Corzine raised their tax rates and cut some of their deductions.”

Does Everyone Who Watches Cable News Write About It?

|

I have previously written that I believe there are now two electorates in the US. One is a pretty small one that consists of people like the readers of this blog and others like it and faithful viewers of the cable news yappers of the left, right & center – the voters who pay a lot of attention to and know a lot about politics. The other is a much, much larger group that pays almost no attention to politics or government.

There’s new evidence of big the gap is between the 2 electorates. It’s from a recent New York Times story about cable ratings.

http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/26/cnn-drops-to-last-place-among-cable-news-networks/?hp

An Innovative Idea for Governor Paterson

|

With the State of New York approaching bankruptcy, members of the state legislature are calling for “innovative ideas” to prevent the interests that have backed them over the years from having to give anything up. By innovation, they mean deferring costs to the future, spending future revenues today, and making sure that when their generation walks out of there laughing all the way, there will be nothing left for anyone that follows them. Since Governor Paterson was a member of that legislature and participated in all those deals and favors over the years, the legislature believes he will be once again easy to roll. What choice does he have?

Barack Obama, Patrick Gaspard and the White House owe NYC Dems an explanation

|

After 16 continuous years of Republican mayors in New York City, you would think that there would be an urgency amongst democrats (nationwide) to get rid of this present pompous and arrogant mayor Michael Bloomberg: well you could have fooled me. After watching President Barack Obama (and surely his political director /Patrick Gaspard too) insult the democrat’s nominee William (Billy) Thompson, with what must be described as the worst half-assed endorsement ever given to a mayoral candidate for a major political party, I am demanding an explanation from the White House.

What the hell is going on?

Will history be made in Nassau County on Election Day 2009?

|

Come next Tuesday 3rd November 2009, Mr. Carrie Solages will be on the ballot for County Clerk of Nassau. This Long Island native is a thirty year old lawyer employed at his family’s law firm (Solages and Solages). He has been described as “the young rising star of the Nassau County Democratic Party”. This description came from none other than Thomas (Tom) R. Suozzi himself: Nassau’s County Executive. Suozzi made this comment last May when he nominated Solages for the post.

Mr. Solages has been a member of the Nassau County Commission on Human Rights since 2007, and was an assistant District Attorney in the Bronx before starting with this law firm. He was born on Long Island to a black immigrant couple from the Caribbean nation of Haiti. If elected he will be the first black person to have ever held this position.  Many Caribbean-Americans here (and not just Haitian-Americans) are quite proud of this candidate; expect a bump in turnout in certain parts of the county.

The Pension Rate of Return Swindle

|

There are any number of ways that Generation Greed has financed its lifestyle demands by sucking resources out of the future and away from those who will live in it, with many listed and described here.  (If you haven’t read that post, please do so). The generational inequity most likely to lead to an institutional collapse at the state and local level is the practice of assuming an unjustifiably high rate of return for public employee pension fund assets, using that assumption to hand out permanently vested pension enhancements to those cashing in and moving out, and then raising taxes, slashing services, and cutting the pay and benefits of future public employees when those mythical returns fail to materialize. In New York State, since the disastrous pension deal of June 13, 2000, the assumed rate of return – from the peak of the stock market bubble – has been 8.0% or more.

High returns are used not only to hand out pension deals to public employee unions in exchange for perpetual incumbency, but also to justify lower than necessary government contributions to the funds, allowing the cost to be deferred and hidden. Since the union members are guaranteed ever-sweetened pensions, not paying for it now just means more must be paid for it later. I challenged the candidates for City Comptroller to announce what they thought a fair assumption for the rate of return on pension assets is. None did so, implying that they want to continue or enhance the fraud — at the expense of younger generations they don’t care about, with the possible exception of their own children. But in case likely Comptroller Liu has other plans, I’ll answer my own question for his benefit.

Barack Obama and the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize

|

What’s the fuss?

Do tell me what’s happening?

All this talk from right-wing republicans about whether or not Barack Obama deserved to win the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize comes from spiteful and resentful perches. Always remember that there are very few people who possess the moral courage to support another’s success without envy. Republicans have demonstrated this with full regal display, ever since the day the announcement was made, that Obama had won the internationally prestigious and coveted Nobel Peace Prize: and attendant award(s).

Of course Barack deserved the Nobel: he earned it over the years with his articulation, suave, depth, sophistication and overall brilliance; despite a couple blatant mistakes. He earned it with his work on nuclear arms reduction while in the senate. He earned it with his commonsensical approach to diplomacy: engagement not confrontation; dialogue not escalation; inclusion not isolation; more mutual respect and less threatening behaviors; and so on, and so on. He earned it because he has raised hope and lowered fear. He earned it because he has charted a positive course forward for US foreign policy in the short-term. He earned it because of exactly what he accomplished: becoming the first mulatto to attain the office of US president. The rest of the world is quite aware of US racial history folks; trust me on this one.

Hiram, Fire’um(?) & HYFIN

|

JUSTICE WILLIAM ERLBAUM: The American verdict of 'not guilty' can indicate one of two things,…Innocence, or the case is not proven. In the case of these [felony assault counts], the case has not been proven.

Agree with the verdict or not, Justice Erlbaum’s words, with their implicit acknowledgment of what he likely thought actually occurred (even if he did not think it beyond a reasonable doubt) are, since the matter’s inception, among the few things said about the Monserrate case by someone who has attained their job by election, which are actually at least arguably defensible.