We are just a couple of days past a ten-year anniversary. On July 11th 2000, then-Governor Pataki signed one of the biggest of the recent pension enhancements. Comptroller Carl McCall had pushed for some of the changes, which had passed the legislature several times without any votes against but had previously faced Pataki vetoes, and New York City Mayor Giuliani had pushed other changes as part of a deal he had cut with the public employee unions. Pataki, Giulani and McCall, all looking for support (or neutrality) in runs for higher office at the time, claimed that the pension enhancements (which will be discussed in the next post) would cost absolutely nothing. Because the pension law passed in 2000 asserted that from the high point of the biggest stock market bubble in history, the New York State and New York City pensions funds would earn an additional 8.0% per year on average into the future, not the 7.0% that had previously been assumed. New York State and its local governments, and those throughout the country, had already cut the amount that was being contributed to the pension plans based on high stock prices, to levels below what my model finds would be required to pay for the pensions. So how accurate has that 8.0% rate of return assertion turned out to be, and what are the consequences?